Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 135: 107359, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37852530

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low-income Hispanic families face marked disparities in obesity, but interventions for obesity prevention and treatment have rarely been designed with this population as a focus. Hispanic culture is characterized by Familism, a value that prioritizes familial respect, cooperation, and togetherness. We describe the rationale and design of a trial of the Healthy Living Program (HeLP), a bilingual whole-family behavioral obesity prevention and treatment intervention designed around the value Familism and addressing food insecurity. METHODS/DESIGN: This two-group randomized comparative effectiveness trial will compare the effects of HeLP versus a primary care counseling intervention (Recommended Treatment of Obesity in Primary Care, or RTOP) on decreasing body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) in Hispanic children 2-16 years of age with obesity and preventing BMI increase among siblings without obesity. 164 families per arm will be recruited from primary care practices. Families randomized to HeLP will participate in 12 two-hour sessions, followed by booster sessions. HeLP sessions include family meals and instruction in parenting skills, nutrition, culinary skills, fitness, and mindfulness delivered at community recreation centers by bilingual health educators and athletic trainers. Families randomized to RTOP will be offered individual visits in primary care every 3 months throughout the 18-month follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include changes to objectively measured child fitness, the home environment related to nutrition, physical activity, and media usage, food insecurity, child eating behaviors, quality of life, parent BMI and waist circumference, and implementation outcomes. DISCUSSION: This protocol paper describes the rationale and planned methods for the comparative effectiveness trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT05041855 (6/13/2023).


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Obesidad , Humanos , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Estilo de Vida Saludable , Obesidad Infantil/etnología , Obesidad Infantil/prevención & control , Calidad de Vida , Familia , Obesidad/etnología , Obesidad/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
3.
BMC Neurol ; 11: 102, 2011 Aug 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21846334

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS), defined by recurrent stereotypical episodes of nausea and vomiting, is a relatively-common disabling and historically difficult-to-treat condition associated with migraine headache and mitochondrial dysfunction. Limited data suggests that the anti-migraine therapies amitriptyline and cyproheptadine, and the mitochondrial-targeted cofactors co-enzyme Q10 and L-carnitine, have efficacy in episode prophylaxis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 42 patients seen by one clinician that met established CVS diagnostic criteria revealed 30 cases with available outcome data. Participants were treated on a loose protocol consisting of fasting avoidance, co-enzyme Q10 and L-carnitine, with the addition of amitriptyline (or cyproheptadine in those < 5 years) in refractory cases. Blood level monitoring of the therapeutic agents featured prominently in management. RESULTS: Vomiting episodes resolved in 23 cases, and improved by > 75% and > 50% in three and one additional case respectively. Among the three treatment failures, two could not tolerate amitriptyline (as was also the case in the child with only > 50% efficacy) and one had multiple congenital gastrointestinal anomalies. Excluding the latter case, substantial efficacy (> 75% response) was 26/29 at the start of treatment, and 26/26 in those able to tolerate the regiment, including high dosages of amitriptyline. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a protocol consisting of mitochondrial-targeted cofactors (co-enzyme Q10 and L-carnitine) plus amitriptyline (or possibly cyproheptadine in preschoolers) coupled with blood level monitoring is highly effective in the prevention of vomiting episodes.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Captación Adrenérgica/uso terapéutico , Amitriptilina/uso terapéutico , Carnitina/uso terapéutico , Ubiquinona/análogos & derivados , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico , Vómitos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Dietoterapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ubiquinona/uso terapéutico , Vómitos/dietoterapia , Adulto Joven
4.
BMC Neurol ; 10: 10, 2010 Jan 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20109231

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS), which is defined by recurrent stereotypical episodes of nausea and vomiting, is a relatively-common disabling condition that is associated with migraine headache and mitochondrial dysfunction. Co-enzyme Q10 (Co-Q) is a nutritional supplement that has demonstrated efficacy in pediatric and adult migraine. It is increasingly used in CVS despite the complete lack of studies to demonstrate its value in treatment METHODS: Using an Internet-based survey filled out by subjects with CVS or their parents, the efficacy, tolerability and subject satisfaction in CVS prophylaxis were queried. Subjects taking Co-Q (22 subjects) were compared against those taking amitriptyline (162 subjects), which is the general standard-of-care. RESULTS: Subjects/parents reported similar levels of efficacy for a variety of episode parameters (frequency, duration, number of emesis, nausea severity). There was a 50% reduction in at least one of those four parameters in 72% of subjects treated with amitriptyline and 68% of subjects treated Co-Q. However, while no side effects were reported on Co-Q, 50% of subjects on amitriptyline reported side effects (P = 5 x 10-7), resulting in 21% discontinuing treatment (P = 0.007). Subjects/parents considered the benefits to outweigh the risks of treatment in 47% of cases on amitriptyline and 77% of cases on Co-Q (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the natural food supplement Co-Q is potentially efficacious and tolerable in the treatment of CVS, and should be considered as an option in CVS prophylaxis. Our data would likely be helpful in the design of a double-blind clinical trial.


Asunto(s)
Amitriptilina/uso terapéutico , Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Ubiquinona/análogos & derivados , Vómitos/tratamiento farmacológico , Edad de Inicio , Amitriptilina/efectos adversos , Antieméticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Internet , Padres , Satisfacción del Paciente , Periodicidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Síndrome , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ubiquinona/efectos adversos , Ubiquinona/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA